# What is the super-sample covariance? A fresh perspective for   second-order shear statistics

**Authors:** Laila Linke, Pierre A. Burger, Sven Heydenreich, Lucas Porth, Peter, Schneider

arXiv: 2302.12277 · 2023-12-04

## TL;DR

This paper derives a comprehensive covariance model for second-order shear statistics in weak lensing, revealing the significance of finite-field effects and their impact on covariance estimation beyond the large-field approximation.

## Contribution

It introduces a first-principles derivation of the covariance, including finite-field terms, and shows how to estimate covariances using smaller-scale correlation functions without large-scale data.

## Key findings

- Finite-field terms significantly affect covariance estimates.
- Covariance of real-space statistics can be estimated from smaller scales.
- Transforming power spectrum covariance to real-space covariance is generally invalid.

## Abstract

Cosmological analyses of second-order weak lensing statistics require precise and accurate covariance estimates. These covariances are impacted by two sometimes neglected terms: A negative contribution to the Gaussian covariance due to finite survey area and the super-sample covariance (SSC) which for the power spectrum contains the impact by Fourier modes larger than the survey window. We show here that these two effects are connected and can be seen as correction terms to the "large-field-approximation", the asymptotic case of an infinitely large survey area. We describe the two terms collectively as "Finite-Field-Terms".   We derive the covariance of second-order shear statistics from first principles. For this, we use an estimator in real space without relying on an estimator for the power spectrum. The resulting covariance does not scale inversely with the survey area, as naively assumed. This scaling is only correct under the large-field approximation when the contribution of the finite-field terms tends to zero. Furthermore, all parts of the covariance, not only the SSC, depend on the power- and trispectrum at all modes, including those larger than the survey. We also show that it is generally impossible to transform an estimate for the power spectrum covariance into the covariance of a real-space statistic. Such a transformation is only possible in the asymptotic case of the "large-field approximation".   Additionally, we find that the total covariance of a real-space statistic can be calculated using correlation functions estimates on spatial scales smaller than the survey window. Consequently, estimating covariances of real-space statistics, in principle, does not require information on spatial scales larger than the survey area. We demonstrate that this covariance estimation method is equivalent to the standard sample covariance method.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/2302.12277/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/2302.12277/full.md

## References

36 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/2302.12277/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/2302.12277