# Characterizing the nucleus of comet 162P/Siding Spring using   ground-based photometry

**Authors:** Abbie Donaldson, Rosita Kokotanekova, Agata Ro\.zek, Colin Snodgrass,, Daniel Gardener, Simon F. Green, Nafiseh Masoumzadeh, James Robinson

arXiv: 2302.12141 · 2023-03-08

## TL;DR

This study combines new and archival photometry to model the shape, rotation, and surface properties of comet 162P/Siding Spring's nucleus, providing insights into its structure and observational characteristics.

## Contribution

The paper presents a convex shape model of 162P's nucleus derived from ground-based lightcurves, including new data, and discusses implications for comet nucleus morphology and future LSST observations.

## Key findings

- Shape model with axis ratios 1.56 and 2.33
- Sidereal rotation period of 32.864 hours
- Linear phase function with slope 0.051 mag/deg

## Abstract

Comet 162P/Siding Spring is a large Jupiter-family comet with extensive archival lightcurve data. We report new r-band nucleus lightcurves for this comet, acquired in 2018, 2021 and 2022. With the addition of these lightcurves, the phase angles at which the nucleus has been observed range from $0.39^\circ$ to $16.33^\circ$. We absolutely-calibrate the comet lightcurves to r-band Pan-STARRS 1 magnitudes, and use these lightcurves to create a convex shape model of the nucleus by convex lightcurve inversion. The best-fitting shape model for 162P has axis ratios $a/b = 1.56$ and $b/c = 2.33$, sidereal period $P = 32.864\pm0.001$ h, and a rotation pole oriented towards ecliptic longitude $\lambda_E = 118^\circ \pm 26^\circ$ and latitude $\beta_E=-50^\circ\pm21^\circ$. We constrain the possible nucleus elongation to lie within $1.4 < a/b < 2.0$ and discuss tentative evidence that 162P may have a bilobed structure. Using the shape model to correct the lightcurves for rotational effects, we derive a linear phase function with slope $\beta=0.051\pm0.002$ mag deg$^{-1}$ and intercept $H_r(1,1,0) = 13.86 \pm 0.02$ for 162P. We find no evidence that the nucleus exhibited an opposition surge at phase angles down to 0.39$^\circ$. The challenges associated with modelling the shapes of comet nuclei from lightcurves are highlighted, and we comment on the extent to which we anticipate that LSST will alleviate these challenges in the coming decade.

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/2302.12141/full.md

## Figures

14 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/2302.12141/full.md

## References

65 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/2302.12141/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/2302.12141