Sparse, Geometric Autoencoder Models of V1
Jonathan Huml, Abiy Tasissa, Demba Ba

TL;DR
This paper introduces a structured sparse autoencoder model that organizes latent representations for spectral clustering, producing artificial neurons that better match primate visual cortex data.
Contribution
It proposes a novel autoencoder architecture with a weighted-$ ext{l}_1$ constraint that enhances structured sparsity and hierarchical differentiation of receptive fields.
Findings
Latent representations are organized for spectral clustering.
Artificial neurons better match primate data.
The weighted-$ ext{l}_1$ constraint improves structured sparsity.
Abstract
The classical sparse coding model represents visual stimuli as a linear combination of a handful of learned basis functions that are Gabor-like when trained on natural image data. However, the Gabor-like filters learned by classical sparse coding far overpredict well-tuned simple cell receptive field (SCRF) profiles. A number of subsequent models have either discarded the sparse dictionary learning framework entirely or have yet to take advantage of the surge in unrolled, neural dictionary learning architectures. A key missing theme of these updates is a stronger notion of \emph{structured sparsity}. We propose an autoencoder architecture whose latent representations are implicitly, locally organized for spectral clustering, which begets artificial neurons better matched to observed primate data. The weighted- (WL) constraint in the autoencoder objective function maintains core…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural dynamics and brain function · CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors · Cell Image Analysis Techniques
