There Are No Post-Quantum Weakly Pseudo-Free Families in Any Nontrivial Variety of Expanded Groups
Mikhail Anokhin

TL;DR
This paper proves that in any nontrivial variety of expanded groups, there are no post-quantum weakly pseudo-free families, highlighting fundamental limitations in cryptographic constructions within these algebraic structures.
Contribution
It establishes the non-existence of post-quantum weakly pseudo-free families in nontrivial varieties of expanded groups, extending understanding of algebraic limitations in cryptography.
Findings
No post-quantum weakly pseudo-free families exist in these algebraic varieties.
Results hold even in worst-case and black-box models.
Depends on classification of finite simple groups under certain conditions.
Abstract
Let be a finite set of finitary operation symbols and let be a nontrivial variety of -algebras. Assume that for some set of group operation symbols, all -algebras in are groups under the operations associated with the symbols in . In other words, is assumed to be a nontrivial variety of expanded groups. In particular, can be a nontrivial variety of groups or rings. Our main result is that there are no post-quantum weakly pseudo-free families in , even in the worst-case setting and/or the black-box model. In this paper, we restrict ourselves to families of computational and black-box -algebras (where ) such that for every , each element of is represented by a unique bit string of length polynomial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
