The MeerKAT Absorption Line Survey: Homogeneous continuum catalogues towards a measurement of the cosmic radio dipole
J. D. Wagenveld, H.-R. Kl\"ockner, N. Gupta, P. P. Deka, P., Jagannathan, S. Sekhar, S. A. Balashev, E. Boettcher, F. Combes, K. L. Emig,, M. Hilton, G. I. G. J\'ozsa, P. Kamphuis, D. Y. Klutse, K. Knowles, J.-K., Krogager, A. Mohapatra, E. Momjian, K. Moodley, S. Muller

TL;DR
This paper analyzes systematic effects in radio source catalogues from MeerKAT data to improve measurements of the cosmic radio dipole, which tests the isotropy of the Universe and has implications for cosmology.
Contribution
It presents a detailed assessment of systematic biases in radio source catalogues and demonstrates how to correct for them to enable precise dipole measurements.
Findings
Catalogues contain 16,313 sources over 37.5 deg²
Corrected number counts reach down to 100-200 μJy
Dipole can be measured at 3σ significance with 100 pointings
Abstract
The number counts of homogeneous samples of radio sources are a tried and true method of probing the large scale structure of the Universe, as most radio sources outside the galactic plane are at cosmological distances. As such they are expected to trace the cosmic radio dipole, an anisotropy analogous to the dipole seen in the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Results have shown that although the cosmic radio dipole matches the direction of the CMB dipole, it has a significantly larger amplitude. This result challenges our assumption of the Universe being isotropic, which can have large repercussions for the current cosmological paradigm. Though significant measurements have been made, sensitivity to the radio dipole is generally hampered by systematic effects that can cause large biases in the measurement. Here we assess these systematics with data from the MeerKAT Absorption Line…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
