On Inductive Biases for Machine Learning in Data Constrained Settings

TL;DR

This paper investigates how incorporating known functions and inductive biases, especially from kernel methods, can improve learning in data-constrained scenarios, focusing on sequences, graphs, and sample efficiency.

Contribution

It introduces a framework replacing some neural modules with known functions to embed inductive biases, enhancing learning with limited data and analyzing sample requirements in convex models.

Findings

Effective use of known functions improves learning in data-scarce settings

Relationship between inductive biases and deep learning advances clarified

Sample screening techniques can identify informative data points efficiently

Abstract

Learning with limited data is one of the biggest problems of machine learning. Current approaches to this issue consist in learning general representations from huge amounts of data before fine-tuning the model on a small dataset of interest. While such technique, coined transfer learning, is very effective in domains such as computer vision or natural langage processing, it does not yet solve common problems of deep learning such as model interpretability or the overall need for data. This thesis explores a different answer to the problem of learning expressive models in data constrained settings: instead of relying on big datasets to learn neural networks, we will replace some modules by known functions reflecting the structure of the data. Very often, these functions will be drawn from the rich literature of kernel methods. Indeed, many kernels can reflect the underlying structure of the data, thus sparing learning parameters to some extent. Our approach falls under the hood of "inductive biases", which can be defined as hypothesis on the data at hand restricting the space of models to explore during learning. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach in the context of sequences, such as sentences in natural language or protein sequences, and graphs, such as molecules. We also highlight the relationship between our work and recent advances in deep learning. Additionally, we study convex machine learning models. Here, rather than proposing new models, we wonder which proportion of the samples in a dataset is really needed to learn a "good" model. More precisely, we study the problem of safe sample screening, i.e, executing simple tests to discard uninformative samples from a dataset even before fitting a machine learning model, without affecting the optimal model. Such techniques can be used to prune datasets or mine for rare samples.