Why is the prediction wrong? Towards underfitting case explanation via meta-classification
Sheng Zhou (CEDRIC - VERTIGO, CNAM, LADIS), Pierre Blanchart (LADIS),, Michel Crucianu (CEDRIC - VERTIGO, CNAM), Marin Ferecatu (CEDRIC - VERTIGO,, CNAM)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a heuristic method that explains misclassified data points by projecting them into interpretable meta-representations and using a meta-classifier to diagnose whether errors are due to model underfitting or data inseparability.
Contribution
The work presents a novel approach combining meta-representations and meta-classification to interpret individual misclassifications, especially underfitting cases, with high accuracy and transferability.
Findings
Achieved over 80% diagnosis label accuracy.
Meta-representation provides invariance across classifiers and datasets.
Meta-classifier effectively distinguishes between underfitting and data overlap errors.
Abstract
In this paper we present a heuristic method to provide individual explanations for those elements in a dataset (data points) which are wrongly predicted by a given classifier. Since the general case is too difficult, in the present work we focus on faulty data from an underfitted model. First, we project the faulty data into a hand-crafted, and thus human readable, intermediate representation (meta-representation, profile vectors), with the aim of separating the two main causes of miss-classification: the classifier is not strong enough, or the data point belongs to an area of the input space where classes are not separable. Second, in the space of these profile vectors, we present a method to fit a meta-classifier (decision tree) and express its output as a set of interpretable (human readable) explanation rules, which leads to several target diagnosis labels: data point is either…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
