Triple birthday matches in the Senate: Lies, damned lies and chatGPT
Rick Durrett

TL;DR
This paper investigates the probability of at least three senators sharing a birthday, highlighting ChatGPT's failure to answer such probability questions and providing a more accurate solution inspired by mathematical resources.
Contribution
The paper offers a corrected probability calculation for triple birthday matches in the Senate, contrasting it with ChatGPT's inadequate responses.
Findings
ChatGPT failed to answer the birthday probability question.
A more accurate probability estimate was derived.
The study emphasizes the importance of mathematical resources in AI responses.
Abstract
Our question is ``What is the probability that at least three members of the senate share the same birthday?'' Before the pandemic, I asked this question in several popular math talks I gave at universities across the country. Inspired by ChatGPT's abysmal failure to answer the question, I have recently come back to this problem and now have a more satisfactory answer, thanks in no small part to what I learned form a page of Wolfram's Math World, which I located by a Google search.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
