On Douglas-Rachford splitting that generally fails to be a proximal mapping: A degenerate proximal point analysis
Feng Xue

TL;DR
This paper investigates the Douglas-Rachford splitting method, revealing that it often cannot be considered a proximal mapping, and extends recent findings to broader contexts using degenerate proximal point analysis.
Contribution
It demonstrates that Douglas-Rachford splitting reduces to a resolvent but generally isn't a proximal mapping, broadening the understanding of its properties through degenerate proximal point analysis.
Findings
Douglas-Rachford splitting reduces to a resolvent
Generally fails to be a proximal mapping
Implications for operator splitting algorithms
Abstract
Based on a degenerate proximal point analysis, we show that the Douglas-Rachford splitting can be reduced to a well-defined resolvent, but generally fails to be a proximal mapping. This extends the recent result of [Bauschke, Schaad and Wang. Math. Program., 168 (2018), pp. 55-61] to more general setting. The related concepts and consequences are also discussed. In particular, the results regarding the maximal and cyclic monotonicity are instrumental for analyzing many operator splitting algorithms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptimization and Variational Analysis · Fixed Point Theorems Analysis · Elasticity and Material Modeling
