The Effect of Information Type on Human Cognitive Augmentation
Ron Fulbright, Samuel McGaha

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different types of information provided by cognitive systems influence human cognitive performance, demonstrating that conceptual information yields the most significant augmentation in accuracy, precision, and power.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence that the nature of information from cognitive systems affects the level of human cognitive augmentation, highlighting conceptual information as most effective.
Findings
Conceptual information significantly improves cognitive accuracy.
Conceptual information enhances cognitive precision.
Conceptual information increases cognitive power.
Abstract
When performing a task alone, humans achieve a certain level of performance. When humans are assisted by a tool or automation to perform the same task, performance is enhanced (augmented). Recently developed cognitive systems are able to perform cognitive processing at or above the level of a human in some domains. When humans work collaboratively with such cogs in a human/cog ensemble, we expect augmentation of cognitive processing to be evident and measurable. This paper shows the degree of cognitive augmentation depends on the nature of the information the cog contributes to the ensemble. Results of an experiment are reported showing conceptual information is the most effective type of information resulting in increases in cognitive accuracy, cognitive precision, and cognitive power.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCognitive Science and Mapping
