Equivariant Trees and Partition Complexes
Julia E. Bergner, Peter Bonventre, Maxine E. Calle, David Chan, Maru Sarazola

TL;DR
This paper introduces $G$-equivariant partitions and trees, demonstrating their $G$-homotopy equivalence, and develops equivariant versions of Quillen's Theorems A and B, advancing the understanding of equivariant homotopy theory.
Contribution
It defines $G$-equivariant partitions and trees, proving their $G$-homotopy equivalence and extending classical theorems to the equivariant setting.
Findings
$G$-equivariant partitions form complexes with $G$-homotopy equivalence to $G$-trees
Develops equivariant versions of Quillen's Theorems A and B
Generalizes non-equivariant results to the equivariant context
Abstract
We introduce two definitions of -equivariant partitions of a finite -set, both of which yield -equivariant partition complexes. By considering suitable notions of equivariant trees, we show that -equivariant partitions and -trees are -homotopy equivalent, generalizing existing results for the non-equivariant setting. Along the way, we develop equivariant versions of Quillen's Theorems A and B, which are of independent interest.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMolecular spectroscopy and chirality · Topological and Geometric Data Analysis · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
