Cross-shell states in $^{15}$C: a test for p-sd interactions
J. Lois-Fuentes, B. Fern\'andez-Dom\'inguez, X. Pereira-L\'opez, F., Delaunay, W. N. Catford, A. Matta, N. A. Orr, T. Duguet, T. Otsuka, V., Som\`a, O. Sorlin, T. Suzuki, N. L. Achouri, M. Assi\'e, S. Bailey, B., Bastin, Y. Blumenfeld, R. Borcea, M. Caama\~no, L. Caceres

TL;DR
This study investigates the low-lying structure of $^{15}$C through neutron-removal reactions, confirming unbound p-shell states and comparing experimental data with shell-model and ab initio calculations to test p-sd interactions.
Contribution
It provides new experimental data on cross-shell states in $^{15}$C and compares these with advanced theoretical models, highlighting the sensitivity to shell gaps and the need for improved calculations.
Findings
Confirmation of unbound p-shell hole states in $^{15}$C
Good agreement with shell-model calculations after monopole term adjustments
Sensitivity of results to the $N=8$ shell gap and theoretical truncation schemes
Abstract
The low-lying structure of C has been investigated via the neutron-removal C reaction. Along with bound neutron sd-shell hole states, unbound p-shell hole states have been firmly confirmed. The excitation energies and the deduced spectroscopic factors of the cross-shell states are an important measure of the neutron configurations in C. Our results show a very good agreement with shell-model calculations using the SFO-tls interaction for C. However, a modification of the - and - monopole terms was applied in order to reproduce the isotone O. In addition, the excitation energies and spectroscopic factors have been compared to the first calculations of C with the self-consistent Green's function method employing the NNLO interaction. The results show the sensitivity to the size…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
