Could $\infty$-category theory be taught to undergraduates?
Emily Riehl

TL;DR
This paper surveys efforts to make $ abla$-category theory more accessible to undergraduates by exploring formal proof methods and univalent foundations, aiming to bridge the gap between ordinary and higher categories.
Contribution
It introduces two programs that simplify $ abla$-category theory: formal proof approaches and univalent foundations, making the subject more approachable for learners.
Findings
Formal proof methods can replicate standard categorical theorems.
Univalent foundations offer a new perspective on $ abla$-categories.
These approaches aim to reduce the complexity of $ abla$-category theory.
Abstract
The extension of ordinary category theory to -categories at the start of the 21st century was a spectacular achievement pioneered by Joyal and Lurie with contributions from many others. Unfortunately, the technical arguments required to solve the infinite homotopy coherence problems inherent in these results make this theory difficult for non-experts to learn. This essay surveys two programs that seek to narrow the gap between -category theory and ordinary 1-category theory. The first leverages similarities between the categories in which 1-categories and -categories live as objects to provide "formal" proofs of standard categorical theorems. The second, which is considerably more speculative, explores -categories from new "univalent" foundations closely related to homotopy type theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Topology and Set Theory
