Some Implications of the Independence Postulate for Physics
Samuel Epstein

TL;DR
This paper examines conflicts between the Independence Postulate and theories like Many Worlds and Constructor Theory, highlighting issues with their consistency and implications for physical processes.
Contribution
It identifies specific conflicts between the Independence Postulate and these theories, providing new insights into their foundational limitations.
Findings
The Many Worlds Theory predicts forbidden sequences in spin measurements.
Constructor Theory faces challenges in classifying possible and forbidden processes.
The Independence Postulate constrains certain theoretical predictions.
Abstract
The Many Worlds Theory and Constructor Theory are in conflict with the Independence Postulate. The conflict with the Many Worlds Theory is shown through the existence of a finite experiment that measures the spin of a large number of electrons. After the experiment there are branches of positive probability which contain forbidden sequences that break the Independence Postulate. Constructor Theory consists of counterfactuals, decreeing certain processes can or cannot occur. However this binary classification meets challenges when describing whether a forbidden sequence can be found or created.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsChaos, Complexity, and Education
