Comparing zeros of distinct Dirichlet L-functions
William D. Banks

TL;DR
This paper proves that for large enough height T, the zeros of distinct primitive Dirichlet L-functions do not coincide within certain regions, with improved bounds for cubefree moduli.
Contribution
It establishes new zero separation results for Dirichlet L-functions with explicit bounds depending on the modulus and a parameter theta.
Findings
Zeros of distinct primitive Dirichlet L-functions are separated in specified regions.
The zero separation result improves for cubefree moduli with a lower theta threshold.
Provides explicit constants c_1, c_2 depending only on theta.
Abstract
For any , we show that there are constants that depend only on for which the following property holds. If are two distinct primitive Dirichlet characters modulo , and , then and do not have the same zeros in the region For cubefree moduli , the same result holds for any .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnalytic Number Theory Research · Meromorphic and Entire Functions · Analytic and geometric function theory
