A Data Mining Approach for Detecting Collusion in Unproctored Online Exams
Janine Langerbein, Till Massing, Jens Klenke, Natalie Reckmann,, Michael Striewe, Michael Goedicke, and Christoph Hanck

TL;DR
This paper presents a data mining approach to detect student collusion in unproctored online exams by analyzing event log data, identifying suspiciously similar exam patterns, and establishing criteria for suspicious cases.
Contribution
It introduces a novel method for detecting collusion in unproctored exams using event log analysis and compares findings with a proctored control group.
Findings
Identified groups of students with suspiciously similar exam patterns
Established a rule of thumb for evaluating suspicious similarity cases
Demonstrated effectiveness of data mining in collusion detection
Abstract
Due to the precautionary measures during the COVID-19 pandemic many universities offered unproctored take-home exams. We propose methods to detect potential collusion between students and apply our approach on event log data from take-home exams during the pandemic. We find groups of students with suspiciously similar exams. In addition, we compare our findings to a proctored control group. By this, we establish a rule of thumb for evaluating which cases are "outstandingly similar", i.e., suspicious cases.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques · Network Security and Intrusion Detection
