Swap Agnostic Learning, or Characterizing Omniprediction via Multicalibration
Parikshit Gopalan, Michael P. Kim, Omer Reingold

TL;DR
This paper introduces Swap Agnostic Learning, linking it to omniprediction and multicalibration, and demonstrates that multicalibration suffices for strong loss guarantees even against adaptive adversaries.
Contribution
It establishes the first equivalence between swap variants of omniprediction, multicalibration, and swap agnostic learning, unifying these concepts under a common framework.
Findings
Swap agnostic learning is feasible for any convex loss.
Multicalibration is essentially equivalent to swap multicalibration.
Existing algorithms can achieve these notions through established multicalibration methods.
Abstract
We introduce and study Swap Agnostic Learning. The problem can be phrased as a game between a predictor and an adversary: first, the predictor selects a hypothesis ; then, the adversary plays in response, and for each level set of the predictor selects a (different) loss-minimizing hypothesis ; the predictor wins if competes with the adaptive adversary's loss. Despite the strength of the adversary, we demonstrate the feasibility Swap Agnostic Learning for any convex loss. Somewhat surprisingly, the result follows through an investigation into the connections between Omniprediction and Multicalibration. Omniprediction is a new notion of optimality for predictors that strengthtens classical notions such as agnostic learning. It asks for loss minimization guarantees (relative to a hypothesis class) that apply not just for a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
