Kloosterman sums do not correlate with periodic functions
Raphael S. Steiner

TL;DR
This paper establishes uniform bounds for Kloosterman sums across all arithmetic progressions, demonstrating that these sums do not exhibit correlation with periodic functions, which advances understanding in analytic number theory.
Contribution
The paper provides the first uniform bounds for Kloosterman sums in all arithmetic progressions and proves their lack of correlation with periodic functions.
Findings
Kloosterman sums are uniformly bounded in all arithmetic progressions.
Kloosterman sums do not correlate with periodic functions.
The results have implications for understanding exponential sums in number theory.
Abstract
We provide uniform bounds for sums of Kloosterman sums in all arithmetic progressions. As a consequence, we find that Kloosterman sums do not correlate with periodic functions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLimits and Structures in Graph Theory · Analytic Number Theory Research
