Using SHAP Values and Machine Learning to Understand Trends in the Transient Stability Limit
Robert I. Hamilton, Panagiotis N. Papadopoulos

TL;DR
This paper employs SHAP values to interpret machine learning models predicting critical clearing time in power systems, providing insights into stability boundaries and influencing variables, especially with increasing system complexity and renewable integration.
Contribution
It introduces a novel interpretability approach using SHAP values for ML models predicting transient stability, enabling location-specific insights and system-wide variable impact analysis.
Findings
SHAP effectively explains ML model predictions for CCT.
Location-specific SHAP analysis reveals variable impacts on stability.
Method applied successfully to IEEE 39-bus system with wind generation.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) for transient stability assessment has gained traction due to the significant increase in computational requirements as renewables connect to power systems. To achieve a high degree of accuracy; black-box ML models are often required - inhibiting interpretation of predictions and consequently reducing confidence in the use of such methods. This paper proposes the use of SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) - a unifying interpretability framework based on Shapley values from cooperative game theory - to provide insights into ML models that are trained to predict critical clearing time (CCT). We use SHAP to obtain explanations of location-specific ML models trained to predict CCT at each busbar on the network. This can provide unique insights into power system variables influencing the entire stability boundary under increasing system complexity and uncertainty.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEnergy Load and Power Forecasting · Power System Optimization and Stability · Power System Reliability and Maintenance
MethodsAttention Is All You Need · Test · Linear Layer · Dropout · Layer Normalization · Dense Connections · Multi-Head Attention · Absolute Position Encodings · Adam · Position-Wise Feed-Forward Layer
