Tensor-to-scalar ratio forecasts for extended LiteBIRD frequency configurations
U. Fuskeland, J. Aumont, R. Aurlien, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, H., K. Eriksen, J. Errard, R. T. G\'enova-Santos, T. Hasebe, J. Hubmayr, H., Imada, N. Krachmalnicoff, L. Lamagna, G. Pisano, D. Poletti, M. Remazeilles,, K. L. Thompson, L. Vacher, I. K. Wehus, S. Azzoni

TL;DR
This paper evaluates how extending the frequency range of the LiteBIRD satellite's instruments improves the accuracy of detecting primordial gravitational waves by reducing uncertainties in the tensor-to-scalar ratio through better component separation.
Contribution
It demonstrates that increasing the high-frequency coverage of LiteBIRD enhances the precision of $r$ measurements, especially under complex dust models, by up to 50%.
Findings
Extending frequency range to 600 GHz reduces $r$ uncertainty by 30-50%.
Most improvements are achieved at 500 GHz.
Broader frequency coverage improves model discrimination.
Abstract
LiteBIRD is a planned JAXA-led CMB B-mode satellite experiment aiming for launch in the late 2020s, with a primary goal of detecting the imprint of primordial inflationary gravitational waves. Its current baseline focal-plane configuration includes 15 frequency bands between 40 and 402 GHz, fulfilling the mission requirements to detect the amplitude of gravitational waves with the total uncertainty on the tensor-to-scalar ratio, , down to . A key aspect of this performance is accurate astrophysical component separation, and the ability to remove polarized thermal dust emission is particularly important. In this paper we note that the CMB frequency spectrum falls off nearly exponentially above 300 GHz relative to the thermal dust SED, and a relatively minor high frequency extension can therefore result in even lower uncertainties and better model…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
