Quantum Advantage from One-Way Functions
Tomoyuki Morimae, Takashi Yamakawa

TL;DR
This paper establishes quantum advantage using minimal assumptions like one-way functions, introducing IV-PoQ protocols that differentiate quantum from classical provers, with implications based on various cryptographic assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces inefficient-verifier proofs of quantumness (IV-PoQ) constructed from classical commitments, demonstrating quantum advantage from basic cryptographic assumptions.
Findings
Quantum advantage demonstrated from one-way functions.
Construction of IV-PoQ protocols with classical cryptographic assumptions.
Quantum advantage shown under worst-case-hard assumptions.
Abstract
We demonstrate quantum advantage with several basic assumptions, specifically based on only the existence of OWFs. We introduce inefficient-verifier proofs of quantumness (IV-PoQ), and construct it from classical bit commitments. IV-PoQ is an interactive protocol between a verifier and a quantum prover consisting of two phases. In the first phase, the verifier is probabilistic polynomial-time, and it interacts with the prover. In the second phase, the verifier becomes inefficient, and makes its decision based on the transcript of the first phase. If the prover is honest, the inefficient verifier accepts with high probability, but any classical malicious prover only has a small probability of being accepted by the inefficient verifier. Our construction demonstrates the following results: (1)If one-way functions exist, then IV-PoQ exist. (2)If distributional collision-resistant hash…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Cryptography and Data Security
