Hardness of monadic second-order formulae over succinct graphs
Guilhem Gamard, Ali\'enor Goubault-Larrecq, Pierre Guillon, Pierre Ohlmann, K\'evin Perrot, Guillaume Theyssier

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that most nontrivial monadic second-order properties over succinctly represented graphs are computationally hard, contrasting with Courcelle's theorem, and explores the complexity when certain conditions are relaxed.
Contribution
It establishes a complexity dichotomy for MSO properties over succinct graphs and analyzes the impact of dropping cw-nontriviality on logical decision problems.
Findings
Every cw-nontrivial MSO property is NP-hard or coNP-hard over succinct graphs.
The complexity dichotomy fails when cw-nontriviality is dropped, assuming a reasonable complexity hypothesis.
The results contrast with Courcelle's meta-theorem by considering succinct graph representations.
Abstract
Our main result is a succinct counterpoint to Courcelle's meta-theorem as follows: every cw-nontrivial monadic second-order (MSO) property is either NP-hard or coNP-hard over graphs given by succinct representations. Succint representations are Boolean circuits computing the adjacency relation. Cw-nontrivial properties are those which have infinitely many models and infinitely many countermodels with bounded cliquewidth. Moreover, we explore what happens when the cw-nontriviality condition is dropped and show that, under a reasonable complexity assumption, the previous dichotomy fails, even for questions expressible in first-order logic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
