Addressing Systematics in the Traceback Age of the $\beta$ Pictoris Moving Group
Dominic Couture, Jonathan Gagn\'e, Ren\'e Doyon

TL;DR
This study identifies and corrects systematic errors affecting the traceback age of the $eta$ Pictoris Moving Group, resulting in a more accurate age estimate that aligns with other dating methods, using Gaia DR3 data.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new numerical traceback analysis tool and demonstrates how correcting for systematics refines the age estimate of $eta$PMG.
Findings
Uncorrected gravitational redshift biases age by ~2 Myr.
Contamination biases age by ~3 Myr.
Corrected age of $eta$PMG is 20.4 ± 2.5 Myr.
Abstract
We characterize the impact of several sources of systematic errors on the computation of the traceback age of the Pictoris Moving Group (PMG). We find that uncorrected gravitational redshift and convective blueshift bias absolute radial velocity measurements by 0.6 kms, which leads to erroneously younger traceback ages by 2 Myr. Random errors on parallax, proper motion, and radial velocity measurements lead to an additional bias of 1.5 Myr on traceback ages. Contamination of astrometric and kinematic data by kinematic outliers and unresolved multiple systems in the full input sample of 76 members and candidates of PMG also erroneously lowers traceback ages by 3 Myr. We apply our new numerical traceback analysis tool to a core sample of 25 carefully vetted members of PMG using Gaia Data Release 3 (DR3) data products and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeophysics and Gravity Measurements · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
