A Survey of Feature detection methods for localisation of plain sections of Axial Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Ji\v{r}\'i Martin\r{u}, Jan Novotn\'y, Karel Ad\'amek, Petr, \v{C}erm\'ak, Ji\v{r}\'i Kozel, David \v{S}koloud\'ik

TL;DR
This survey evaluates various feature detection methods for localizing plain sections of axial brain MRI images, focusing on their robustness and accuracy in patient matching and atlas alignment.
Contribution
It introduces a methodology for comparing feature detection techniques in MRI image matching, highlighting the effectiveness of SIFT and HardNet in this context.
Findings
Some techniques match most patient MRI slices accurately.
Performance drops significantly when matching to brain atlas.
SIFT combined with HardNet achieves 93% accuracy among patients.
Abstract
Matching MRI brain images between patients or mapping patients' MRI slices to the simulated atlas of a brain is key to the automatic registration of MRI of a brain. The ability to match MRI images would also enable such applications as indexing and searching MRI images among multiple patients or selecting images from the region of interest. In this work, we have introduced robustness, accuracy and cumulative distance metrics and methodology that allows us to compare different techniques and approaches in matching brain MRI of different patients or matching MRI brain slice to a position in the brain atlas. To that end, we have used feature detection methods AGAST, AKAZE, BRISK, GFTT, HardNet, and ORB, which are established methods in image processing, and compared them on their resistance to image degradation and their ability to match the same brain MRI slice of different patients. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
