Towards Inferential Reproducibility of Machine Learning Research
Michael Hagmann, Philipp Meier, Stefan Riezler

TL;DR
This paper advocates for modeling and analyzing sources of variance in machine learning evaluation to improve the reliability and interpretability of research results, rather than simply removing noise.
Contribution
It introduces the use of linear mixed effects models and variance component analysis to incorporate and analyze multiple sources of nondeterminism in ML evaluation.
Findings
Linear mixed effects models effectively analyze evaluation scores.
Variance component analysis quantifies sources of variance.
Reliability coefficient measures the impact of noise on evaluation.
Abstract
Reliability of machine learning evaluation -- the consistency of observed evaluation scores across replicated model training runs -- is affected by several sources of nondeterminism which can be regarded as measurement noise. Current tendencies to remove noise in order to enforce reproducibility of research results neglect inherent nondeterminism at the implementation level and disregard crucial interaction effects between algorithmic noise factors and data properties. This limits the scope of conclusions that can be drawn from such experiments. Instead of removing noise, we propose to incorporate several sources of variance, including their interaction with data properties, into an analysis of significance and reliability of machine learning evaluation, with the aim to draw inferences beyond particular instances of trained models. We show how to use linear mixed effects models (LMEMs)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Data Classification · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
MethodsTest
