Well formedness vs weak well formedness
Victor Przyjalkowski

TL;DR
This paper compares two definitions of well formedness in weighted projective spaces, showing they differ generally but coincide for certain quasi-smooth weighted complete intersections of dimension three or more.
Contribution
It clarifies the relationship between two existing definitions of well formedness and identifies conditions under which they agree.
Findings
The two definitions of well formedness differ in general.
They coincide for quasi-smooth weighted complete intersections of dimension at least 3.
The paper provides a precise comparison and conditions for equivalence.
Abstract
In the literature there are two definitions of well formed varieties in weighted projective spaces. According to the first one, well formed variety is the one whose intersection with the singular locus of the ambient weighted projective space has codimension at least two, while, according to the second one, well formed variety is the one who does not contain in codimension one a singular stratum of the ambient weighted projective space. We show that these two definitions indeed differ, and show that they coincide for quasi-smooth weighted complete intersections of dimension at least 3.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Commutative Algebra and Its Applications · Polynomial and algebraic computation
