Computational philosophy of science
Micha{\l} J. Gajda

TL;DR
This paper proposes a novel computational complexity approach to philosophy of science, aiming to better describe and improve scientific processes compared to traditional logical methods.
Contribution
It introduces a new perspective using computational complexity theory to analyze scientific processes, moving beyond previous logical and mathematical approaches.
Findings
Highlights limitations of logical approaches in philosophy of science
Suggests computational complexity offers a more comprehensive framework
Proposes potential improvements in understanding scientific methodologies
Abstract
Philosophy of science attempts to describe all parts of the scientific process in a general way in order to facilitate the description, execution and improvements of this process. So far, all proposed philosophies have only covered existing processes and disciplines partially and imperfectly. In particular logical approaches have always received a lot of attention due to attempts to fundamentally address issues with the definition of science as a discipline with reductionist theories. We propose a new way to approach the problem from the perspective of computational complexity and argue why this approach may be better than previous propositions based on pure logic and mathematics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhilosophy and History of Science · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
