PINN Training using Biobjective Optimization: The Trade-off between Data Loss and Residual Loss
Fabian Heldmann, Sarah Berkhahn, Matthias Ehrhardt, Kathrin Klamroth

TL;DR
This paper introduces a biobjective optimization approach for training physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), balancing data and residual losses, and demonstrates its application to COVID-19 modeling with a novel SVIHR model.
Contribution
It presents a multiobjective training framework for PINNs that explicitly considers the trade-off between data and residual losses, applicable to various ODE-based systems.
Findings
Biobjective PINN training improves COVID-19 prediction accuracy.
The approach effectively balances data fit and physical law adherence.
Applicable to diverse dynamical systems beyond epidemiology.
Abstract
Physics informed neural networks (PINNs) have proven to be an efficient tool to represent problems for which measured data are available and for which the dynamics in the data are expected to follow some physical laws. In this paper, we suggest a multiobjective perspective on the training of PINNs by treating the data loss and the residual loss as two individual objective functions in a truly biobjective optimization approach. As a showcase example, we consider COVID-19 predictions in Germany and built an extended susceptibles-infected-recovered (SIR) model with additionally considered leaky-vaccinated and hospitalized populations (SVIHR model) to model the transition rates and to predict future infections. SIR-type models are expressed by systems of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). We investigate the suitability of the generated PINN for COVID-19 predictions and compare the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModel Reduction and Neural Networks
