Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of "Artificial Intelligence as a Service"
Kornel Lewicki, Michelle Seng Ah Lee, Jennifer Cobbe, Jatinder Singh

TL;DR
This paper critically examines how AI as a Service (AIaaS) can perpetuate biases and fairness issues due to its one-size-fits-all approach, highlighting the need for context-aware solutions.
Contribution
It introduces a taxonomy of AIaaS based on user autonomy levels and analyzes how different services may lead to biases or harm in applications.
Findings
AIaaS often embeds biases affecting societal fairness
The taxonomy clarifies levels of user control in AIaaS
Highlighting challenges encourages development of fairer AIaaS solutions
Abstract
"AI as a Service" (AIaaS) is a rapidly growing market, offering various plug-and-play AI services and tools. AIaaS enables its customers (users) - who may lack the expertise, data, and/or resources to develop their own systems - to easily build and integrate AI capabilities into their applications. Yet, it is known that AI systems can encapsulate biases and inequalities that can have societal impact. This paper argues that the context-sensitive nature of fairness is often incompatible with AIaaS' 'one-size-fits-all' approach, leading to issues and tensions. Specifically, we review and systematise the AIaaS space by proposing a taxonomy of AI services based on the levels of autonomy afforded to the user. We then critically examine the different categories of AIaaS, outlining how these services can lead to biases or be otherwise harmful in the context of end-user applications. In doing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
