Euclid preparation. XXXII. Evaluating the weak lensing cluster mass biases using the Three Hundred Project hydrodynamical simulations
Euclid Collaboration: C. Giocoli (1, 2), M. Meneghetti (1, 2),, E. Rasia (3, 4), S. Borgani (3, 5, 6, 4), G. Despali (7), G. F., Lesci (8, 1), F. Marulli (8, 1, 2), L. Moscardini (8, 1, 2),, M. Sereno (1, 2), W. Cui (9, 10, 11), A. Knebe (9, 10, 12), G., Yepes (9, 10)

TL;DR
This study uses hydrodynamical simulations to assess biases in weak lensing cluster mass estimates, revealing how modeling choices, orientation, and redshift affect accuracy, informing future Euclid and Rubin survey calibrations.
Contribution
It systematically analyzes weak lensing mass biases using hydrodynamical simulations, highlighting the impact of model assumptions and cluster orientation on mass estimates.
Findings
Mass bias is 5-10% when modeling concentration dynamically.
Fixing concentration reduces bias below 5%.
Orientation along the major axis inflates mass estimates.
Abstract
The photometric catalogue of galaxy clusters extracted from ESA Euclid data is expected to be very competitive for cosmological studies. Using state-of-the-art hydrodynamical simulations, we present systematic analyses simulating the expected weak lensing profiles from clusters in a variety of dynamic states and at wide range of redshifts. In order to derive cluster masses, we use a model consistent with the implementation within the Euclid Consortium of the dedicated processing function and find that, when jointly modelling mass and the concentration parameter of the Navarro-Frenk-White halo profile, the weak lensing masses tend to be, on average, biased low by 5-10% with respect to the true mass, up to z=0.5. Using a fixed value for the concentration , the mass bias is diminished below 5%, up to z=0.7, along with its relative uncertainty. Simulating the weak lensing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
