Chatbots for Robotic Process Automation: Investigating Perceived Trust and User Satisfaction
Alessandro Casadei, Stephan Schl\"ogl, Markus Bergmann

TL;DR
This study investigates how perceived trust and user satisfaction are influenced by task complexity in human-chatbot interactions within robotic process automation, highlighting that simpler, multi-step conversations enhance user experience.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence on the impact of task complexity on trust and satisfaction, emphasizing conversation structure in chatbot design for automation.
Findings
Higher task complexity reduces trust and satisfaction.
Short, multi-step conversations are perceived as less complex.
Descriptive, broad answers increase perceived complexity.
Abstract
Driven by ongoing improvements in machine learning, chatbots have increasingly grown from experimental interface prototypes to reliable and robust tools for process automation. Building on these advances, companies have identified various application scenarios, where the automated processing of human language can help foster task efficiency. To this end, the use of chatbots may not only decrease costs, but it is also said to boost user satisfaction. People's intention to use and/or reuse said technology, however, is often dependent on less utilitarian factors. Particularly trust and respective task satisfaction count as relevant usage predictors. In this paper, we thus present work that aims to shed some light on these two variable constructs. We report on an experimental study (), investigating four different human-chatbot interaction tasks. After each task, participants were…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
