How to extend closure and interior operations to more modules
Neil Epstein, Rebecca R. G., and Janet Vassilev

TL;DR
This paper axiomatizes three methods to extend closure and interior operations to more modules, analyzing their properties and interactions with other desirable features like heredity and residuality.
Contribution
It introduces a unified axiomatic framework for extending closure and interior operations, incorporating examples like tight closure and integral closure.
Findings
Identifies three axiomatic methods for operation extension
Analyzes properties like hereditary, residual, and cofunctorial
Explores interactions with finitistic property
Abstract
There are several ways to convert a closure or interior operation to a different operation that has particular desirable properties. In this paper, we axiomatize 3 ways to do so, drawing on disparate examples from the literature, including tight closure, basically full closure, and various versions of integral closure. In doing so, we explore several such desirable properties, including *hereditary*, *residual*, and *cofunctorial*, and see how they interact with other properties such as the *finitistic* property.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCommutative Algebra and Its Applications · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
