TL;DR
This paper proposes enhancing hypercomplex meta-heuristic optimization by replacing the Euclidean norm with the Minkowski p-norm, leading to improved solutions in benchmark functions without extra computational cost.
Contribution
It introduces the idea of using Minkowski p-norm instead of Euclidean norm in hypercomplex optimization, enabling better solutions through a simple, fine-tuned adjustment.
Findings
Minkowski p-norm improves solution quality over Euclidean norm.
The approach is effective across multiple benchmark functions.
Fine-tuning p is cost-free and does not add hyperparameters.
Abstract
The continuous computational power growth in the last decades has made solving several optimization problems significant to humankind a tractable task; however, tackling some of them remains a challenge due to the overwhelming amount of candidate solutions to be evaluated, even by using sophisticated algorithms. In such a context, a set of nature-inspired stochastic methods, called meta-heuristic optimization, can provide robust approximate solutions to different kinds of problems with a small computational burden, such as derivative-free real function optimization. Nevertheless, these methods may converge to inadequate solutions if the function landscape is too harsh, e.g., enclosing too many local optima. Previous works addressed this issue by employing a hypercomplex representation of the search space, like quaternions, where the landscape becomes smoother and supposedly easier to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
