Team Plan Recognition: A Review of the State of the Art
Loren Rieffer-Champlin

TL;DR
This paper reviews the current state of team plan recognition, focusing on logic-based methods, discussing challenges, and highlighting recent approaches to improve AI understanding of human team activities.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive survey of logic-based team plan recognition methods, emphasizing recent developments and identifying future research directions.
Findings
Logic-based methods are effective for team plan recognition.
Recent approaches improve accuracy in understanding team actions.
The survey highlights gaps and challenges in current methods.
Abstract
There is an increasing need to develop artificial intelligence systems that assist groups of humans working on coordinated tasks. These systems must recognize and understand the plans and relationships between actions for a team of humans working toward a common objective. This article reviews the literature on team plan recognition and surveys the most recent logic-based approaches for implementing it. First, we provide some background knowledge, including a general definition of plan recognition in a team setting and a discussion of implementation challenges. Next, we explain our reasoning for focusing on logic-based methods. Finally, we survey recent approaches from two primary classes of logic-based methods (plan library-based and domain theory-based). We aim to bring more attention to this sparse but vital topic and inspire new directions for implementing team plan recognition.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
