Gaussian-boson-sampling-enhanced dense subgraph finding shows limited advantage over efficient classical algorithms
Naomi R. Solomons, Oliver F. Thomas, Dara P. S. McCutcheon

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the potential quantum advantage of Gaussian boson sampling for dense subgraph finding, concluding that classical algorithms can efficiently simulate it under realistic error conditions, limiting quantum speedup.
Contribution
It demonstrates that errors like loss and spectral impurity diminish the quantum advantage of GBS in dense subgraph algorithms, showing classical simulation is feasible.
Findings
Classical algorithms can simulate GBS under realistic errors.
Quantum advantage for dense subgraph finding is at most polynomial.
Less stringent quantum device requirements could still achieve some speedup.
Abstract
Recent claims of achieving exponential quantum advantage have attracted attention to Gaussian boson sampling (GBS), a potential application of which is dense subgraph finding. We investigate the effects of sources of error including loss and spectral impurity on GBS applied to dense subgraph finding algorithms. We find that the effectiveness of these algorithms is remarkably robust to errors, to such an extent that there exist efficient classical algorithms that can simulate the underlying GBS. These results imply that the speedup of GBS-based algorithms for the dense subgraph problem over classical approaches is at most polynomial, though this could be achieved on a quantum device with dramatically less stringent requirements on loss and photon purity than general GBS.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlind Source Separation Techniques · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
