Solvent quality and solvent polarity in polypeptides

TL;DR

This study uses molecular dynamics to explore how different solvents affect the folding and stability of various polypeptides, revealing complex solvation behaviors that challenge the simple 'like dissolves like' principle.

Contribution

It provides detailed insights into the solvation mechanisms of polypeptides in polar and nonpolar solvents, emphasizing the dominant role of the peptide backbone and solvent polarity.

Findings

Undeca-glycine folds stably in water, others show folding-unfolding dynamics.

Polypeptides remain extended in cyclohexane regardless of polarity.

Solvation free energy is favorable across solvents, driven mainly by backbone stabilization.

Abstract

Using molecular dynamics and thermodynamic integration, we report on the solvation process in water and in cyclohexane of seven polypeptides (GLY, ALA, ILE, ASN, LYS, ARG, GLU). The polypeptides are selected to cover the full hydrophobic scale while varying their chain length from tri- to undeca-homopeptides provide indications on possible non-additivity effects as well as the role of the peptide backbone in the overall stability of the polypeptides. The use of different solvents and different polypeptides allows us to investigate the relation between solvent quality -- the capacity of a given solvent to fold a given biopolymer often described on a scale ranging from "good" to "poor", and solvent polarity -- related to the specific interactions of any solvent with respect to a reference solvent. Undeca-glycine is found to be the only polypeptides to have a proper stable collapse in water (polar solvent), with the other hydrophobic polypetides displaying in water repeated folding and unfolding events and with polar polypeptides presenting a even more complex behavior. By contrast, all polypeptides but none are found to keep an extended conformation in cyclohexane, irrespective of their polarity. All considered polypeptides are also found to have a favorable solvation free energy independently of the solvent polarity and their intrinsic hydrophobicity, clearly highlighting the prominent stabilizing role of the peptide backbone, with the solvation process largely enthalpically dominated in polar polypeptides and partially entropically driven for hydrophobic polypeptides. Our study thus reveals the complexity of the solvation process of polypeptides defying the common view " like dissolves like", with the solute polarity playing the most prominent role. The absence of a mirror symmetry upon the inversion of polarities of both the solvent and the polypeptides is confirmed.