Top and bottom quark forward-backward asymmetries at next-to-next-to-leading order QCD in (un)polarized electron positron collisions
Werner Bernreuther, Long Chen, Peng-Cheng Lu, Zong-Guo Si

TL;DR
This paper calculates next-to-next-to-leading order QCD corrections to forward-backward asymmetries in top and bottom quark production in electron-positron collisions, including polarization effects, providing precise theoretical predictions for collider experiments.
Contribution
It provides the first NNLO QCD calculations of forward-backward asymmetries for top and bottom quarks, incorporating polarization and different jet definitions, enhancing precision in theoretical predictions.
Findings
QCD corrections to top-quark asymmetry are significant and polarization-dependent.
QCD corrections to bottom-quark asymmetry at the Z peak are small, making it a precise observable.
Different jet algorithms affect the definition and calculation of bottom-quark asymmetries.
Abstract
We consider, at order in the QCD coupling, top-quark pair production in the continuum at various center-of-mass energies and -quark pair production at the resonance by (un)polarized electron and positron beams. For top quarks we compute the forward-backward asymmetry with respect to the top-quark direction of flight, the associated polar angle distribution, and we analyze the effect of beam polarization on the QCD corrections to the leading-order asymmetry. We calculate also the polarized forward-backward asymmetry. For -quark production at the peak we explore different definitions of . In particular, we analyze jets defined by the Durham and the flavor- clustering algorithms. We compute the inclusive -jet and two-jet asymmetry with respect to the -jet direction. For the latter asymmetry the QCD corrections to order are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
