2022 Update on $\varepsilon_K$ with lattice QCD inputs
Sunghee Kim, Sunkyu Lee, Weonjong Lee, Jaehoon Leem, Sungwoo Park

TL;DR
This paper updates the calculation of the CP violation parameter _K in the standard model using lattice QCD inputs, revealing a significant tension with experimental measurements when using exclusive b|, but not with inclusive b|.
Contribution
It provides the latest lattice QCD-based evaluation of _K, highlighting the discrepancy between theory and experiment with exclusive b| values.
Findings
Standard model with exclusive b| explains only 65% of _K's experimental value.
Significant tension (_K discrepancy) at 3.9-5.1 sigma level with exclusive b|.
Tension disappears when using inclusive b|, but the small discrepancy persists and grows over time.
Abstract
We present recent updates for determined directly from the standard model (SM) with lattice QCD inputs such as , , , , , , , and . We find that the standard model with exclusive and other lattice QCD inputs describes only 65% of the experimental value of and does not explain its remaining 35%, which leads to a strong tension in at the level between the SM theory and experiment. We also find that this tension disappears when we use the inclusive value of obtained using the heavy quark expansion based on the QCD sum rule approach, although this inclusive tension is small () but keeps increasing as time goes on.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions · Superconducting Materials and Applications
