Benefits of Multiobjective Learning in Solar Energy Prediction

TL;DR

This paper explores multiobjective learning in solar energy prediction, demonstrating how Pareto frontiers can effectively balance accuracy, fairness, and other metrics using XGBoost models trained on real-world data.

Contribution

It introduces a novel multiobjective approach using weighted single-objective training routines to generate Pareto optimal solutions in renewable energy forecasting.

Findings

Multiobjective models outperform single-objective counterparts in accuracy and fairness.

Pareto frontiers provide diverse tradeoff solutions for different priorities.

Real-world data experiments validate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Abstract

While the space of renewable energy forecasting has received significant attention in the last decade, literature has primarily focused on machine learning models that train on only one objective at a time. A host of classification (and regression) tasks in energy markets lead to highly imbalanced training data. Say, to balance reserves, it is natural for market regulators to have a choice to be more/less averse to false negatives (can lead to poor operating efficiency and costs) than to false positives (can lead to market shortfall). Besides accuracy, other metrics like algorithmic bias, RMBE (in regression problems), inferencing time, and model sparsity are also very crucial. This paper is amongst the firsts in the field of renewable energy forecasting that attempts to present a Pareto frontier of solutions (tradeoffs), that answers the question on handling multiple objectives by means of using the XGBoost model (Gradient Boosted Trees). Our proposed algorithm relies on using a sequence of weighted (uniform meshes) single objective model training routines. Real world data examples from the Amherst (Massachusetts, United States) solar energy prediction panels with both triobjective (focus on accuracy) and biojective (focus on fairness/bias) classification instances are considered. Numerical experiments appear promising and clear advantages over single objective methods are seen by observing the spread and variety of solutions (model configurations).