Informational Diversity and Affinity Bias in Team Growth Dynamics

TL;DR

This paper models team formation dynamics to understand how affinity bias and informational diversity influence team composition and performance, revealing path-dependent behaviors and potential limitations of utility-driven diversity efforts.

Contribution

It introduces a sequential model of team growth that captures how initial compositions and biases affect the pursuit of informational diversity and team performance.

Findings

Teams can get stuck at suboptimal diversity levels.

Majority groups may crowd out minority opinions.

Initial team composition influences long-term diversity and performance.

Abstract

Prior work has provided strong evidence that, within organizational settings, teams that bring a diversity of information and perspectives to a task are more effective than teams that do not. If this form of informational diversity confers performance advantages, why do we often see largely homogeneous teams in practice? One canonical argument is that the benefits of informational diversity are in tension with affinity bias. To better understand the impact of this tension on the makeup of teams, we analyze a sequential model of team formation in which individuals care about their team's performance (captured in terms of accurately predicting some future outcome based on a set of features) but experience a cost as a result of interacting with teammates who use different approaches to the prediction task. Our analysis of this simple model reveals a set of subtle behaviors that team-growth dynamics can exhibit: (i) from certain initial team compositions, they can make progress toward better performance but then get stuck partway to optimally diverse teams; while (ii) from other initial compositions, they can also move away from this optimal balance as the majority group tries to crowd out the opinions of the minority. The initial composition of the team can determine whether the dynamics will move toward or away from performance optimality, painting a path-dependent picture of inefficiencies in team compositions. Our results formalize a fundamental limitation of utility-based motivations to drive informational diversity in organizations and hint at interventions that may improve informational diversity and performance simultaneously.