Epsilon-Identifiability of Causal Quantities
Ang Li, Scott Mueller, Judea Pearl

TL;DR
This paper introduces epsilon-identifiability, a framework for bounding causal effects and counterfactuals when full identifiability isn't possible, by leveraging narrow bounds on subpopulations, with applications to unit selection.
Contribution
It proposes epsilon-identifiability as a new approach to partially identify causal quantities under limited data and assumptions.
Findings
Partial bounds on unidentifiable causal effects are achievable.
Epsilon-identifiability helps narrow causal effect estimates in practice.
Application demonstrated in unit selection problems.
Abstract
Identifying the effects of causes and causes of effects is vital in virtually every scientific field. Often, however, the needed probabilities may not be fully identifiable from the data sources available. This paper shows how partial identifiability is still possible for several probabilities of causation. We term this epsilon-identifiability and demonstrate its usefulness in cases where the behavior of certain subpopulations can be restricted to within some narrow bounds. In particular, we show how unidentifiable causal effects and counterfactual probabilities can be narrowly bounded when such allowances are made. Often those allowances are easily measured and reasonably assumed. Finally, epsilon-identifiability is applied to the unit selection problem.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
