Compairing categories of Lubin-Tate $(\varphi_L,\Gamma_L)$-modules
Peter Schneider, Otmar Venjakob

TL;DR
This paper compares different categories of Lubin-Tate $(L,G)$-modules over various rings, studies their Herr-complexes, and analyzes the properties of Lubin Tate extensions in relation to decompleting towers.
Contribution
It introduces a comparison of categories of $(L,G)$-modules over different rings and examines their Herr-complexes, also characterizing Lubin Tate extensions as weakly decompleting towers.
Findings
Lubin Tate extensions form weakly decompleting towers
Comparison of categories over perfect and imperfect rings
Analysis of Herr-complexes associated with these modules
Abstract
In the Lubin-Tate setting we compare different categories of -modules over various perfect or imperfect coefficient rings. Moreover, we study their associated Herr-complexes. Finally, we show that a Lubin Tate extension gives rise to a weakly decompleting, but not decompleting tower in the sense of Kedlaya and Liu.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Advanced Algebra and Geometry
