On the inconsistency of separable losses for structured prediction
Caio Corro

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that separable negative log-likelihood losses in structured prediction can be inconsistent with the true data distribution, raising concerns about their effectiveness for optimal structured prediction.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical proof that these common losses are not necessarily Bayes consistent, challenging their assumed suitability for structured prediction tasks.
Findings
Separable negative log-likelihood losses may not lead to the most probable structure.
Minimizing these losses does not guarantee Bayes optimal predictions.
The results question the appropriateness of these losses for structured prediction.
Abstract
In this paper, we prove that separable negative log-likelihood losses for structured prediction are not necessarily Bayes consistent, or, in other words, minimizing these losses may not result in a model that predicts the most probable structure in the data distribution for a given input. This fact opens the question of whether these losses are well-adapted for structured prediction and, if so, why.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Statistical Methods and Inference · Forecasting Techniques and Applications
