Fundamental Lack of Information in Observed Disease and Hospitalization Data
Adam Mielke, Lasse Engbo Christiansen

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates, using SEIR-models, that traditional disease data cannot reveal the true extent of underreporting, implying the need for alternative methods to determine actual infection rates.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical proof that underreporting levels cannot be inferred from standard disease observables alone.
Findings
Traditional observables do not reveal true attack rates.
Underreporting levels are fundamentally unidentifiable from disease data.
Alternative methods are required to estimate true infection levels.
Abstract
We present a proof based on SEIR-models that shows it is impossible to identify the level of under reporting based on traditional observables of the disease dynamics alone. This means that the true attack rate must be determined through other means.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsData-Driven Disease Surveillance
