Safety of self-assembled neuromorphic hardware
Can Rager, Kyle Webster

TL;DR
This paper discusses the safety considerations of neuromorphic hardware, emphasizing its potential for scalable, brain-inspired computing and the need for safety research to adapt to this emerging paradigm.
Contribution
It highlights the importance of integrating safety and interpretability into neuromorphic hardware development for reliable AI at scale.
Findings
Neuromorphic hardware offers scalable, brain-inspired computing.
Safety research should expand to include neuromorphic systems.
Supporting NMH safety can enhance trustworthy AI deployment.
Abstract
The scalability of modern computing hardware is limited by physical bottlenecks and high energy consumption. These limitations could be addressed by neuromorphic hardware (NMH) which is inspired by the human brain. NMH enables physically built-in capabilities of information processing at the hardware level. In other words, brain-like features bias hardware towards intelligence at scale. Neuropmorphic computing paradigms require a novel approach to safe, interpretable AI. In order to effectively engage the risk of misaligned AI, safety research may need to expand its scope to include NMH. This may be best achieved by supporting those currently engaged in NMH capability research to work on safety and related areas.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
