Bitcoin Does Not Hedge Inflation
Mykola Pinchuk

TL;DR
This paper investigates how Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies respond to macroeconomic news, finding Bitcoin reacts negatively to inflation surprises, challenging the belief that it hedges inflation.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence that Bitcoin does not hedge inflation and identifies consumption-savings shifts as a key factor influencing its price response.
Findings
Bitcoin decreases by 24 bps after inflation surprise
Other cryptocurrencies show no reaction to macroeconomic news
Bitcoin's response is linked to shifts in consumption-savings decisions
Abstract
This paper examines the response of major cryptocurrencies to macroeconomic news announcements (MNA). While other cryptocurrencies exhibit no reaction to major MNA, Bitcoin responds negatively to inflation surprise. Price of Bitcoin decreases by 24 bps in response to a 1 standard deviation inflationary surprise. This reaction is inconsistent with widely-held beliefs of practitioners that Bitcoin can hedge inflation. I do not find support for the hypothesis that the negative response of Bitcoin to inflation is due to its negative exposure to interest rates. Instead, I find support for the hypothesis that Bitcoin is strongly affected by the shift in consumption-savings decisions, driven by the rise in inflation. Consistent with this view, Bitcoin has negative exposure to a proxy for the consumption-savings ratio.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMarket Dynamics and Volatility · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security · Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
