Does Search Engine Optimization come along with high-quality content? A comparison between optimized and non-optimized health-related web pages
Sebastian Schulthei{\ss}, Helena H\"au{\ss}ler, Dirk Lewandowski

TL;DR
This study investigates whether health-related web pages with SEO practices are of higher quality, finding that non-optimized pages are perceived as more expert and trustworthy, highlighting potential mismatches between SEO and content quality.
Contribution
The paper provides empirical evidence that SEO does not necessarily correlate with higher content quality in health information web pages.
Findings
Non-optimized pages rated as more expert by users
Non-optimized pages received more positive comments
No difference in ratings between laypeople and experts
Abstract
Searching for medical information is both a common and important activity since it influences decisions people make about their healthcare. Using search engine optimization (SEO), content producers seek to increase the visibility of their content. SEO is more likely to be practiced by commercially motivated content producers such as pharmaceutical companies than by non-commercial providers such as governmental bodies. In this study, we ask whether content quality correlates with the presence or absence of SEO measures on a web page. We conducted a user study in which N = 61 participants comprising laypeople as well as experts in health information assessment evaluated health-related web pages classified as either optimized or non-optimized. The subjects rated the expertise of non-optimized web pages as higher than the expertise of optimized pages, justifying their appraisal by the more…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
