Which Hessenberg varieties are GKM?
Rebecca Goldin, Julianna Tymoczko

TL;DR
This paper investigates which Hessenberg varieties in type A are GKM spaces, identifying specific families with torus actions that have isolated fixed points and finite one-dimensional orbits, and explores their geometric properties.
Contribution
The paper classifies certain Hessenberg varieties in type A as GKM spaces and analyzes their torus stability and geometric structure, highlighting which are unions of Schubert varieties.
Findings
Some Hessenberg varieties are GKM spaces with isolated fixed points.
Not all Hessenberg varieties with torus actions are GKM.
Certain Hessenberg varieties are unions of Schubert varieties.
Abstract
Hessenberg varieties form a class of subvarieties of the flag variety , parameterized by an operator and certain subspaces of the Lie algebra of . We identify several families of Hessenberg varieties in type that are -stable subvarieties of , as well as families that are invariant under a subtorus of . In particular, these varieties are candidates for the use of equivariant methods to study their geometry. Indeed, we are able to show that some of these varieties are unions of Schubert varieties, while others cannot be such unions. Among the -stable Hessenberg varieties, we identify several that are {\it GKM spaces}, meaning acts with isolated fixed points and a finite number of one-dimensional orbits, though we also show that not all Hessenberg varieties with torus actions and finitely many fixed points are GKM. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Nonlinear Waves and Solitons · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
