The Impossibility of Parallelizing Boosting
Amin Karbasi, Kasper Green Larsen

TL;DR
This paper proves that parallelizing boosting algorithms is fundamentally limited, requiring exponentially more resources, which challenges the feasibility of efficient parallel boosting methods.
Contribution
It provides a strong negative theoretical result showing that parallelizing boosting is inherently resource-intensive and likely impractical.
Findings
Parallel boosting cannot be significantly accelerated without exponential resource increase.
Theoretical proof of the inherent sequential nature of boosting algorithms.
Implication that boosting's sequential structure limits parallelization efforts.
Abstract
The aim of boosting is to convert a sequence of weak learners into a strong learner. At their heart, these methods are fully sequential. In this paper, we investigate the possibility of parallelizing boosting. Our main contribution is a strong negative result, implying that significant parallelization of boosting requires an exponential blow-up in the total computing resources needed for training.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · Face and Expression Recognition · Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
