AMR Magnetic Sensors in Flux Expulsion Studies

TL;DR

This paper discusses the use of AMR magnetic sensors for flux expulsion studies in superconducting niobium cavities, highlighting their advantages over traditional fluxgate sensors in terms of size and measurement precision.

Contribution

The paper introduces the application of AMR magnetic sensors for flux expulsion measurements, offering a more suitable alternative to fluxgates for small or complex geometries.

Findings

AMR sensors provide better spatial resolution for flux measurements.

Fluxgate sensors have limitations due to their large sensing volume.

AMR sensors are practical for measuring flux on small or irregular surfaces.

Abstract

Magnetic flux expulsion properties of the superconducting material such as bulk niobium, widely used for the radio-frequency cavity fabrication, substantially affect the performance characteristics of the cavities. The quality factor of the SRF resonators can be significantly compromised due to the presence of the trapped flux vortices causing additional RF energy losses in the material. Large number of experiments have been carried out by different research groups to establish the correlation of the flux trapping in niobium cavities with the presence of impurities in niobium as well as various surface treatment methods. Majority of these experiments utilize commercially available cryogenic fluxgate magnetic sensors to measure the field before and after the niobium transition to the superconducting state to quantify the amount of flux trapped. One disadvantage of the typically used fluxgates is the size of the sensing volume. As an example, the Barting-ton F and G type cryogenic fluxgates have a sensing core length of about 30mm, which is comparable to the curvature radius of the cavity walls and hence the magnetic field lines curvature radius after the expulsion. Thus, the measured field value needs to be corrected to account for the sensor effective averaging over the sensing volume. In case of the sharper geometries, for instance if the flux expulsion to be measured on the edge of the rectangular niobium flat sheet with a thickness of ~5mm, the use of the fluxgate would be impractical.